Editorial Policies

Peer-Reviewed Content

  • Defined peer review process for eligible submissions
  • Scientific Committee oversees the review workflow
  • Reviewers may be internal or external, depending on the topic

Non–Peer-Reviewed Content

  • Evaluation is non-scientific and editorial in nature
  • No peer review is conducted
  • No judgment is expressed on research results

Open Research Archive

  • Repository is not automatic and does not accept all deposits
  • Acceptance is selective and editorially determined
  • Deposited content is clearly labeled as such

Editorial Screening

All non–peer-reviewed submissions undergo an editorial screening based on:
– relevance to the scientific scope of the platform
– presence of a minimum scholarly structure
– basic methodological clarity
– compliance with ethical standards

The editorial screening does not constitute peer review or scientific evaluation of results.
Acceptance or refusal remains at the sole and non-syndicable discretion of the Publisher.